All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eugene Surovegin <ebs@ebshome.net>
To: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Option to disable mapping genrtc calls to ppc_md calls
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:54:19 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050118185418.GA31308@gate.ebshome.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <93780AB0-696D-11D9-81BE-003065F9B7DC@embeddededge.com>

On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:25:33AM -0500, Dan Malek wrote:
> There are three reasons.  You don't want to use an I2c rtc clock at
> all in these functions because they get can get called from the
> clock interrupt to update the time in the rtc.  If it does happen to 
> work,
> it creates long latencies in the timer interrupt.  If the i2c requires 
> an
> interrupt, they system will crash or hang.
> 
> A system using an I2C RTC should find some way to access the
> clock from application space as a standard I2C device and manage
> time/clock from the application, not from the kernel.

Well, it was discussed numerous times before with solutions how to use 
i2c based RTC as well.

I use i2c RTC which requires interrupt and guess what, my kernel 
doesn't crash when timer_interrupt calls ppc_md.set_rtc_time.

It's just a matter of writing correct i2c RTC driver.

Dan, please, stop spreading "i2c-RTC" FUD :).

--
Eugene

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-01-18 19:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-01-17 21:10 [RFC] Option to disable mapping genrtc calls to ppc_md calls Mark A. Greer
2005-01-18  9:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-01-18 18:40   ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-18 19:01     ` Eugene Surovegin
2005-01-18 16:15 ` Tom Rini
2005-01-18 16:25   ` Dan Malek
2005-01-18 17:39     ` Tolunay Orkun
2005-01-18 18:33       ` Tom Rini
2005-01-18 18:13     ` Tom Rini
2005-01-18 18:58       ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-18 19:08         ` Tom Rini
2005-01-18 19:43           ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-19 18:08             ` Tom Rini
2005-01-20 20:52               ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-20 22:53                 ` Tom Rini
2005-01-20 23:21                   ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-20 23:47                     ` Tom Rini
2005-01-20 23:56                       ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-18 18:54     ` Eugene Surovegin [this message]
2005-01-20 22:27     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-18 18:55   ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-18 19:05     ` Tom Rini
2005-01-18 19:33       ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-20 22:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-20 23:54   ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-21  0:01     ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-21  0:09       ` Mark A. Greer
2005-01-21  0:12         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-21  9:14           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2005-01-21 14:39             ` Corey Minyard
2005-01-21 22:01             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-01-21  9:44         ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050118185418.GA31308@gate.ebshome.net \
    --to=ebs@ebshome.net \
    --cc=dan@embeddededge.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.