From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dmitry Golubev Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 17:02:17 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB Message-Id: <200501181902.17426.dmitry@mikrotik.com> List-Id: References: <20050118061115.8420123EF73@ws5-4.us4.outblaze.com> In-Reply-To: <20050118061115.8420123EF73@ws5-4.us4.outblaze.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable To: lartc@vger.kernel.org Are you sure we do care about priorities of inner classes? It seems for me = that you do not even have this entry in the memory structure in case of inn= er=20 class - only leaf classes have prios. Dmitry On Tuesday 18 January 2005 17:47, "sanjeev ravindran"=20 wrote: > Thank you for ur response, > Actually I too found the same in user guide of htb... however i was bit > confused about the priority of different classes.... now things are > clear... > thanks again > sanjeev > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "T=F3th N=E1ndor" > To: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl > Subject: Re: [LARTC] Doubt regarding priority of classes with HTB > Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 09:35:12 +0100 > > > Hi! > > > > sanjeev ravindran wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm a bit confused with the priority of different classes with > > > HTB. How it will be? Will the class with lowest no: have maximum > > > priority? > > > > > > Any help is most appreciated, > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Sanjeev > > > > http://luxik.cdi.cz/~devik/qos/htb/manual/userg.htm#prio > > > > "Priorizing traffic has two sides. First it affects how the excess > > bandwidth is distributed among siblings. Up to now we have seen > > that excess bandwidth was distibuted according to rate ratios. Now > > I used basic configuration from chapter 3 (hierarchy without > > ceiling and bursts) and changed priority of all classes to 1 except > > SMTP (green) which I set to 0 (higher). > > From sharing view you see that the class got all the excess > > bandwidth. The rule is that classes with higher priority are > > offered excess bandwidth first. But rules about guaranted rate and > > ceil are still met." > > > > -- Udv, > > Nandor > > _______________________________________________ > > LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl > > http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/ _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/