From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Max Kellermann Subject: Re: [PATCH pom-ng 0/5] RFC: ip_nat|conntrack_h323.c on 2.6, first preview Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:48:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20050119084856.GA15765@roonstrasse.net> References: <20050119004332.GA12629@roonstrasse.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On 2005/01/19 09:30, Jozsef Kadlecsik wrote: > If you want to write a decent helper, then ethereal has got a H.323 > (ASN) decoder written in C, which could probably be re-used. :-) Good idea. This parser already helped me during development. > As for the patch, thus we would overwrite the 2.4 version in pom-ng. > Please put all the files into a h323-conntrack-nat/linux-2.6 > subdirectory so that the support for 2.4 can be kept. (The > README.newpatches file in pom-ng describes in detail how to create a > new patch.) Ok. Someone with svn access should copy the directory h323-conntrack-nat/linux to h323-conntrack-nat/linux-2.6. After that, I can send patches which modify these copies. > > Please note, pom-ng is unable to take into account the extra version. > As requirements you should speficy something like > > Requires: linux-2.6 >= 2.6.11 Will this still work with the old 2.4 version then? Is this dependency ignored when the user wants the old version (and thus only has kernel 2.4)? Max