From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grant Grundler Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:32:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [openib-general] Re: [KJ] [RFC] TODO file cleanups Message-Id: <20050121193221.GE17854@esmail.cup.hp.com> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============25788231178242516==" List-Id: References: <20050117231123.GC19162@nd47.coderock.org> In-Reply-To: <20050117231123.GC19162@nd47.coderock.org> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============25788231178242516== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 09:22:56AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote: > Independent of any licensing questions, there definitely is a real > need to have an external repository for development. We need a place > to test and debug code and coordinate development before sending > patches on. Agreed > (I am beginning to think that it would just be simpler to make all the > openib kernel code simply GPLed, if only to stop these constant > discussions. Perhaps at the developers workshop, the openib board can > make this change) then someone will whine about not being able to port the code to FreeBSD. Either way - someone will whine. If we can, I would prefer to leave the license Dual and then deal with the people who try to violate the GPL. My gut feeling is such people don't care which license the code is published with. grant --===============25788231178242516== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============25788231178242516==--