From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Mauricio Lin <mauriciolin@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>,
Edjard Souza Mota <edjard@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: User space out of memory approach
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 04:32:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050122033219.GG11112@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3f250c7105012113455e986ca8@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 05:45:13PM -0400, Mauricio Lin wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I have another question. You included an oom_adj entry in /proc for
> each process. This was the approach you used in order to allow someone
> or something to interfere the ranking algorithm from userland, right?
> So if i have an another ranking algorithm in user space, I can use it
> to complement the kernel decision as necessary. Was it your idea?
Yes, you should use your userspace algorithm to tune the oom killer via
the oom_adj and you can check the effect of your changes with oom_score.
I posted a one liner ugly script to do that a few days ago on l-k.
The oom_adj has this effect on the badness() code:
/*
* Adjust the score by oomkilladj.
*/
if (p->oomkilladj) {
if (p->oomkilladj > 0)
points <<= p->oomkilladj;
else
points >>= -(p->oomkilladj);
}
The biggest the points become, the more likely the task will be choosen
by the oom killer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-22 3:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-10 21:43 User space out of memory approach Mauricio Lin
2005-01-10 19:20 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-10 19:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-10 23:01 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-10 22:40 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-10 20:05 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-10 23:17 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-10 23:18 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-10 23:24 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-10 23:30 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-11 7:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-11 0:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 2:03 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-11 8:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 8:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-11 7:48 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-11 9:08 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-11 9:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-11 9:27 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-11 9:20 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-11 9:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 9:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-11 10:05 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-11 10:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 10:44 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-11 14:56 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-11 15:27 ` Ilias Biris
2005-01-11 10:00 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-11 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 16:32 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-11 19:16 ` Ilias Biris
2005-01-11 20:46 ` Ilias Biris
2005-01-11 20:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-12 9:31 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-12 11:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-12 12:12 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-13 15:36 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-16 10:06 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-16 21:10 ` Alan Cox
2005-01-17 10:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 21:35 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-01-11 20:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 7:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2005-01-11 10:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-11 11:03 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-11 8:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-21 21:27 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-21 21:45 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-22 3:32 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2005-01-25 21:13 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-25 21:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-26 0:11 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-26 0:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-26 14:03 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-27 18:54 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-27 22:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-27 22:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-27 22:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-27 23:35 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-28 0:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-28 13:58 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-28 15:21 ` Mauricio Lin
2005-01-28 15:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-01-26 7:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2005-01-22 3:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
[not found] <fa.lcmt90h.1j1scpn@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.ht4gei4.1g5odia@ifi.uio.no>
2005-01-16 16:28 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-01-18 13:15 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-19 6:18 ` Bodo Eggert
2005-01-20 3:20 ` Edjard Souza Mota
2005-01-20 5:00 ` Bodo Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050122033219.GG11112@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=edjard@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=mauriciolin@gmail.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.