Re: [ea-in-inode 0/5] Further fixes

[Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>]

On Sunday 23 January 2005 23:58, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > Jan 23 06:54:38 dev4-003 kernel: journal_bmap: journal block not found at
> > offset 1036 on sdc1 Jan 23 06:54:38 dev4-003 kernel: Aborting journal on
> > device sdc1.
>
> Are you using data journaling on that filesystem? Does this test pass with
> the patches backed out? With an external journal?

There are 12 direct and 1024 indirect blocks on a filesystem with 4k 
blocksize, so block 1036 should be the first double-indirect block. It may be 
that something is messing up the double-indirect link or one of its fields. 
Interesting. Could you maybe try this patch as well?

Index: linux-2.6.11-rc1-mm2/fs/ext3/inode.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.11-rc1-mm2.orig/fs/ext3/inode.c
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc1-mm2/fs/ext3/inode.c
@@ -2653,7 +2653,7 @@ static int ext3_do_update_inode(handle_t
 	} else for (block = 0; block < EXT3_N_BLOCKS; block++)
 		raw_inode->i_block[block] = ei->i_data[block];
 
-	if (EXT3_INODE_SIZE(inode->i_sb) > EXT3_GOOD_OLD_INODE_SIZE)
+	if (ei->i_extra_isize)
 		raw_inode->i_extra_isize = cpu_to_le16(ei->i_extra_isize);
 
 	BUFFER_TRACE(bh, "call ext3_journal_dirty_metadata");

Thanks,
-- 
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
SUSE Labs, SUSE LINUX PRODUCTS GMBH