From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Feustel Subject: Re: OpenBSD port for Xen Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:02:32 -0500 Message-ID: <200501242002.33265.dfeustel@verizon.net> References: <200501191606.22899.mparem@cisco.com> <200501241928.00099.dfeustel@verizon.net> <20050124163432.F64295@demos.bsdclusters.com> Reply-To: dfeustel@verizon.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20050124163432.F64295@demos.bsdclusters.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Kip Macy Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Monday 24 January 2005 19:38, Kip Macy wrote: > It is a chunk of work. You have to heavily modify pmap.c, replace all > privileged operations with the corresponding xen operations, and port > over the clock, block, and network device drivers. > In other words, I should wait for full virtualization. > -Kip > > > > On Mon, 24 Jan 2005, Dave Feustel wrote: > > > Is there any chance of this or should I just wait for > > Intel's Vanderpool or AMD's equivalent? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl