From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Becker Subject: Re: Xen and VLANs Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:16:28 -0500 Message-ID: <20050124201628.GX3078@cs.duke.edu> References: <41F54D63.2050203@scalent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41F54D63.2050203@scalent.com> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Evan Bigall Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org " Pinging from Dom2 to Dom1, packet sizes smaller than 1469 work, packet " sizes of 1469 and larger just hang. I'd guess the bridging doesn't account for the space used by the vlan tag. " Has any done any experimentation with VLANs on Xen? Yes, I did the vconfig in dom0 and attached the vlan interface to the bridge. This way no vlan tags go over the bridge. If you really want to see the tags in xenU, this scheme will not help. dom0# vconfig eth0 145 dom0# brctl xen-br0 addif eth0.145 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl