From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:25:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alg138.algor.co.uk ([IPv6:::ffff:62.254.210.138]:49844 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:25:44 +0000 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j0OKMit7002581; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:22:44 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j0OKMiWN002580; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:22:44 GMT Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 20:22:44 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Manish Lachwani Cc: Thiemo Seufer , linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] TX4927 processor can support different speeds Message-ID: <20050124202244.GB2376@linux-mips.org> References: <20050123192318.GA22681@prometheus.mvista.com> <20050123194140.GL15265@rembrandt.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> <20050123195129.GA1806@linux-mips.org> <41F40B8E.2080003@mvista.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41F40B8E.2080003@mvista.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7022 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 12:39:42PM -0800, Manish Lachwani wrote: > Why is this approach (in the patch) bad? It's fragile because clock frequencies are changing faster in today's world of electronics than the weather in April. Ralf