From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Steinar H. Gunderson" Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] autofs 4.1.4 beta1 release Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:14:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20050126161454.GA9417@uio.no> References: <20050126151344.GA841@uio.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: autofs@linux.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 11:35:18PM +0800, raven@themaw.net wrote: >>- There is a patch for rc.autofs.in missing, changing an "else" to en >> "elif". The idea is that failure in loading the autofs4 module should not >> break first-time installation (see http://bugs.debian.org/280276). > What if autofs[4] is not compiled as a module? In that case, it is in /proc/filesystems, and there is no problem. You _could_ argue that is autofs3 was compiled into the kernel, it should fail, but I can't find a good way to detect that. >>- There seem to have been a lot of changes in rc.autofs.in (especially >> related to timeout parsing); I'm unable to follow them all, but I hope >> you've done the right thing in merging in the Debian patches here :-) > Do you remember what the issues were? (Just to clear up; "there seems to have been a lot of changes" refers to your changes, not the Debian changes, although there are several of those as well.) I'm afraid this was before I took over the maintainership of the package; the changelog is the best thing I can point you to. > Yep. There's been a bit of work there, not only related to white space. > Please test this out as I need to know what I've broken. OK, I'll give it a shot a bit later. :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/