From: Greg Banks <gnb@sgi.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] unexport get_wchan
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 01:04:00 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050131140400.GA4038@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050131133617.GJ18316@stusta.de>
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 02:36:17PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The only user of get_wchan I was able to find is the proc fs - and proc
> can't be built modular.
>
> Is the patch below to remove the export of get_wchan correct or did I
> oversee something?
I have an oprofile patch queued up which uses get_wchan. Oprofile
can be built modular.
Greg.
--
Greg Banks, R&D Software Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group.
I don't speak for SGI.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-31 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-31 13:36 [RFC: 2.6 patch] unexport get_wchan Adrian Bunk
2005-01-31 14:04 ` Greg Banks [this message]
2005-10-31 5:30 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050131140400.GA4038@sgi.com \
--to=gnb@sgi.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.