From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Frank Sorenson <frank@tuxrocks.com>,
Doug Dumitru <doug@easyco.com>,
Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>,
"Christopher S. Aker" <caker@theshore.net>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] SKAS3: prerelease of V8 (against 2.6.9) uploaded
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 08:48:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200502010848.30042.rob@landley.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <41FF261A.2070001@tuxrocks.com>
On Tuesday 01 February 2005 01:47 am, Frank Sorenson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Doug Dumitru wrote:
> <snip>
>
> | With 2.6.9 skas3 v8 a plain kill does nothing. With a kill -9, 3 of the
> | four thread die, but one remains and the only way to get rid of it is
> | with a server reboot.
> |
> | Not sure what is going on here, but I have not been able to get anything
> | past 2.6.7 to work while killing virtual rudely.
>
> Will they die if you send a "kill -CONT" followed by the "kill -9"?
>
> Frank
If a kill -9 needs to be followed by a CONT signal to actually take effect on
a stopped process, why is this not a kernel bug? (Kill -9 is supposed to
_mean_ it. I've always thought of it as the "with shotgun" option...)
Rob
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
User-mode-linux-devel mailing list
User-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/user-mode-linux-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-01 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-28 23:36 [uml-devel] SKAS3: prerelease of V8 (against 2.6.9) uploaded Blaisorblade
2005-02-01 3:10 ` Doug Dumitru
2005-02-01 6:47 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-02-01 13:48 ` Rob Landley [this message]
2005-02-01 15:26 ` Frank Sorenson
2005-02-01 16:27 ` Christopher S. Aker
2005-02-01 23:46 ` Doug Dumitru
2005-02-03 19:55 ` Blaisorblade
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200502010848.30042.rob@landley.net \
--to=rob@landley.net \
--cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
--cc=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
--cc=caker@theshore.net \
--cc=doug@easyco.com \
--cc=frank@tuxrocks.com \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.