From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1CxCBC-0007lo-14 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:43:58 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxCB9-0007kV-Di for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:43:55 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CxCB5-0007iD-Sp for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:43:53 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CxCB3-0007cQ-Ss for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:43:49 -0500 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CxBrW-0006VS-Io for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Feb 2005 17:23:38 -0500 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C93CF9D9C7D for ; Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:23:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 4 Feb 05 22:23:37 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:24:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20050204061115.GA20463@miracle> <200502042143.27144.okuji@enbug.org> <87fz0c3tsq.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> In-Reply-To: <87fz0c3tsq.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502042324.26136.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: iterate return values X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2005 22:43:56 -0000 On Friday 04 February 2005 22:21, Marco Gerards wrote: > > For me, it is fine to include ChangeLog entries in a patch. What is > > wrong? > > When you apply the patch it can not be applied when the changelog was > changed by another commit. In that case, you just get it from ChangeLog.rej, no? I think our opinions are different because I rarely use the command "patch" to apply patches for development. I usually apply patches by hand, since I always want to modify patches more or less before applying them. This might be solved if I start complaining a lot in order to let contributors modify patches as I wish, but I think most of them would be merely scared and rush way... > Perhaps I am just confused. I was under the impression the GCS > forces you to use spaces, but I can't find anything about it. And > emacs creates tabs too when indenting. So it seems I was just very > wrong. But you are right actually, since tabs are mostly useless and rather confusing. Okuji