From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Jan Kasprzak <kas@fi.muni.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?
Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 03:11:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050207111149.GH24805@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050207110030.GI24513@fi.muni.cz>
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 12:00:30PM +0100, Jan Kasprzak wrote:
> Well, with Linus' patch to fs/pipe.c the situation seems to
> improve a bit, but some leak is still there (look at the "monthly" graph
> at the above URL). The server has been running 2.6.11-rc2 + patch to fs/pipe.c
> for last 8 days. I am letting it run for a few more days in case you want
> some debugging info from a live system. I am attaching my /proc/meminfo
> and /proc/slabinfo.
Congratulations. You have 688MB of bio's.
-- wli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-07 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-21 16:19 Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? Jan Kasprzak
2005-01-22 2:23 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-01-23 9:11 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-23 9:19 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-23 9:56 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-23 10:32 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-23 20:03 ` Russell King
2005-01-24 11:48 ` Russell King
2005-01-25 19:32 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 8:28 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 8:47 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-27 10:19 ` Alessandro Suardi
2005-01-27 12:17 ` Martin Josefsson
2005-01-27 12:56 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-27 13:03 ` Robert Olsson
2005-01-27 16:49 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 18:37 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-27 19:25 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 20:40 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-28 9:32 ` Russell King
2005-01-27 20:33 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-28 0:17 ` Russell King
2005-01-28 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-28 8:58 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 13:23 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 15:34 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 16:57 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-30 17:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-30 17:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-30 17:58 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-30 18:45 ` Russell King
2005-01-31 2:48 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 4:11 ` Herbert Xu
2005-01-31 4:45 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-01-31 5:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-31 5:11 ` David S. Miller
2005-01-31 5:40 ` Herbert Xu
2005-01-31 5:16 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-01-31 5:42 ` Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
2005-01-30 18:01 ` Russell King
2005-01-30 18:19 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-28 1:41 ` Phil Oester
2005-01-24 0:56 ` Alexander Nyberg
2005-01-24 20:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-24 20:56 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-24 21:05 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-24 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-25 15:53 ` OT " Paulo Marques
2005-01-26 8:01 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 8:11 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 8:40 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 8:44 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 8:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 8:52 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 9:00 ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-01-26 8:58 ` Andrew Morton
2005-01-26 9:03 ` Jens Axboe
2005-01-26 15:52 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-02 9:29 ` Lennert Van Alboom
2005-02-02 16:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-02 16:19 ` Lennert Van Alboom
2005-02-02 17:49 ` Dave Hansen
2005-02-02 18:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-02 19:07 ` Dave Hansen
2005-02-02 21:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-01-24 22:05 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-07 11:00 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-07 11:11 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2005-02-07 15:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-07 15:52 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-07 16:38 ` axboe
2005-02-07 17:35 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-07 21:10 ` Jan Kasprzak
2005-02-08 2:47 ` Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1? (also here) Noel Maddy
2005-02-16 4:00 ` -rc3 leaking NOT BIO [Was: Memory leak in 2.6.11-rc1?] Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 5:12 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-16 6:07 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-17 13:00 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-17 18:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-18 1:38 ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-02-21 4:57 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 23:31 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-16 23:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-17 1:19 ` Parag Warudkar
2005-02-17 3:48 ` Horst von Brand
2005-02-17 13:35 ` Parag Warudkar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050207111149.GH24805@holomorphy.com \
--to=wli@holomorphy.com \
--cc=kas@fi.muni.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.