From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVPR-0000NL-6x for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:28:05 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVPO-0000Lg-Db for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:28:02 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVPK-0000KR-74 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:28:01 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1CyVN3-0007yn-Dd for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 08:25:37 -0500 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CyUra-0004az-0w for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Feb 2005 07:53:06 -0500 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C06FA1A5A3 for ; Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:53:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 8 Feb 05 12:53:03 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:54:01 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20050201044708.GB3969@zulo.hadrons.org> <200502061358.26616.okuji@enbug.org> <20050206212812.GA25570@zulo.hadrons.org> In-Reply-To: <20050206212812.GA25570@zulo.hadrons.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502081354.01411.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: consolidate ELF header checks X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:28:03 -0000 On Sunday 06 February 2005 22:28, Guillem Jover wrote: > Sorry about that, it was not intentional. You asked Marco and he > replied so I though that was enough, then I sent the patch revision > Marco asked and left home, didn't saw your other mails until today. It's okay. Don't mind. I just want to make things clear. > I was hacking on the kFreeBSD loader for GRUB Legacy and needed > other copyright assignments for other GNU projects, so I asked for > GRUB as well. Marco or Jeff pointed me to the assignment procudures. I need to know how you did precisely. Did you ask assign@gnu.org or something else? What template did you use? Did any maintainer of GNU Software specify how to proceed it? BTW, please contact appropriate maintainers before trying to assign copyright from now on. Maintainers of GNU Software are responsible for managing copyright issues. If you bypass the maintainers, they may not keep things consistent, since they are not notified even if the procedures are wrong. For example, I am very afraid that you might have used an obsolete request form. The FSF revises the request form and even the whole procedures from time to time, so you need to request up-to-date information when you assign copyright. Another - more serious - case is that you might have ignored the first request completely and simply sent a filled assignment paper to the FSF. You could do this, if you get a copy from someone who has assigned copyright. If this happens, you wouldn't be informed of all the cautions by the FSF, such as a copyright disclaimer by your employer. Okuji