From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Zarochentsev Subject: Re: AMD64 progress? Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 22:12:58 +0300 Message-ID: <20050208191258.GF7482@backtop.namesys.com> References: <20050114201751.GB5883@backtop.namesys.com> <20050207132934.GA7482@backtop.namesys.com> <1107804896.10689.17.camel@gentoo> <20050207195147.GB7482@backtop.namesys.com> <1107887159.12393.6.camel@gentoo> Mime-Version: 1.0 list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1107887159.12393.6.camel@gentoo> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jake Maciejewski Cc: Isaac Chanin , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:25:58PM -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 22:51 +0300, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 01:34:56PM -0600, Jake Maciejewski wrote: > > > I'm running reiser4progs 1.0.3 and 2.6.10 patched with reiser4 from > > > 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 (and this patch). > > > > > > I've been doing the simultaneous dd and kernel compilation that has > > > always crashed reiser4 on AMD64 in the past. After about an hour with > > > debugging and two hours without debugging, I'm thinking of more ways to > > > torture the FS. For now it looks like reiser4 is working on AMD64! > > > > i think so. reiser4/amd64 passed 5h of stress testing instead of crashing in > > first 30min. > > > Have you been stress testing with debugging disabled? I was doing some > extreme testing and crashed reiser4 with this patch twice. The same test how it crashed? Was the fs corrupted after the crash? > that crashed it one of the times passes on reiserfs (didn't try the > other), and if enable debugging, I can torture reiser4 all night and > still not crash it. I'll do some more tests and try to identify a > simple, reproducible crash scenario. Thanks, Alex.