From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Wed, 09 Feb 2005 00:12:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from alg138.algor.co.uk ([IPv6:::ffff:62.254.210.138]:24038 "EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:11:49 +0000 Received: from dea.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linux-mips.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1906f6x018620; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:06:41 GMT Received: (from ralf@localhost) by dea.linux-mips.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1906eBQ018619; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:06:40 GMT Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 00:06:40 +0000 From: Ralf Baechle To: Rojhalat Ibrahim Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: More than 512MB of memory Message-ID: <20050209000640.GA10651@linux-mips.org> References: <41ED20E3.60309@schenk.isar.de> <20050204004028.GC22311@linux-mips.org> <42072264.6000001@schenk.isar.de> <20050208001742.GA15336@linux-mips.org> <42088CFA.6090605@schenk.isar.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42088CFA.6090605@schenk.isar.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 7210 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk X-list: linux-mips On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Rojhalat Ibrahim wrote: > I presume CKSEG is CKSEG0 in the above patch. With that it works > about the same as before. So do you have any clue what the problem > behind all that really is? Furthermore I still have all those > "Illegal instruction" and "Segmentation fault" messages that > shouldn't be there. Sorry, yes I indeed meant CKSEG0. And this version of the patch really was only meant to optimize the large performance impact your previous patch had; it wasn't meant to fix anything beyond that. As I can't replicate your configuration I'm still starring at the code to find what's wrong ... Ralf