All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
To: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2005@gmx.net>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: EDD failures since edd=off patch
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:23:23 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050210172323.GA29225@lists.us.dell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <420B6BA8.1040808@gmx.net>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:11:52PM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> 
> it seems the edd=off patch has caused some problems with
> some machines I have access to. They simply don't boot
> anymore unless I specify edd=foo. foo can be {off,skip,bar}
> so it seems the hang on boot is related to the parser
> not finding the parameter it is looking for.
> I looked through the code some days ago and it seemed to
> me that the register used to iterate through the command
> line buffer only got its lower 16 bit reset before calling
> into the BIOS. I don't have the code handy right now,
> but I can look later if the hints I gave are insufficient.

Yes, please.  I'm reading the code, and %ecx gets set to
(COMMAND_LINE_SIZE-7) which is 256-7=249.  So the upper 24 bits of
%ecx are going to always be zero, and if "edd=" isn't seen, then %ecx
will be zero when dropping into edd_mbr_sig_start.  The only other
register touched is %esi, but it's pushed at the beginning, and pop'd
on all exit cases, so that should be unchanged.

ZF is the only other bit I can picture.  On the "no edd= option" path,
ZF=0 on exit.  With "edd=of" or "edd=sk", ZF=1.  But with "edd=bar",
ZF=0, which you say works too.  So that's not it...

CF is taken care of around the int13 calls already, so that's not
it...

Thanks,
Matt

-- 
Matt Domsch
Software Architect
Dell Linux Solutions linux.dell.com & www.dell.com/linux
Linux on Dell mailing lists @ http://lists.us.dell.com

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-10 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-10 14:11 EDD failures since edd=off patch Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
2005-02-10 17:23 ` Matt Domsch [this message]
2005-02-11  2:59   ` Carl-Daniel Hailfinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050210172323.GA29225@lists.us.dell.com \
    --to=matt_domsch@dell.com \
    --cc=c-d.hailfinger.devel.2005@gmx.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.