From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Opperisano Subject: Re: RELATED ICMP packets of type 3 Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 10:06:36 -0500 Message-ID: <20050211150635.GA2371@bender.817west.com> References: <200502111757.16352.e-boogie@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200502111757.16352.e-boogie@yandex.ru> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 05:57:16PM +0300, Mikhail Zotov wrote: > Hello everybody, > > I have written an iptables script to protect a machine/LAN > and I'd like to clarify an issue about RELATED ICMP packets > of type 3 (actually, mostly 3/1). > > As far as I understand, it is safe to ACCEPT incoming > packets of this sort. yes. personally (for whatever that is worth), i allow ICMP Types 3, 11, and 12 [*]. > Is it safe to allow _outgoing_ packets of this kind? > Can an attacker make my machine generate such packets > in order to obtain information about it? (All new > incoming packets are just DROPped.) yes. an open plea to all firewall administrators: please stop breaking our Internet!!! -j * http://www.iana.org/assignments/icmp-parameters -- "You couldn't fool your mother on the foolingest day of your life if you had an electrified fooling machine." --The Simpsons