From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: marco ghidinelli Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:27:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] TCP window based shaping Message-Id: <20050214002736.GA8066@circolab.net> List-Id: References: <42095013.8030600@wildgooses.com> In-Reply-To: <42095013.8030600@wildgooses.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 06:18:01PM +0000, Ed Wildgoose wrote: > > Are we all on the same page as to what the problem is? Any more > thoughts on how to tackle it? I'm still not convinced that delaying > ACK's is really any better than the current option to buffer incoming > data. basically, we have smaller queue because we are queueing the small ack, not the big data transfer on the downlink. and delaying ack is the first step to do the delay+advertised window resize that maybe someone (me?) will do in the future. > I guess the receiving machine TCP stack gets it earlier so the > app looks more responsive, but other than the lower lag I don't see much > difference really? > > Curious to hear how your project gets on though! Please keep us informed! of course! :) -- BOFH excuse #208: Your mail is being routed through Germany ... and they're censoring us. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/