From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nSf-0004A6-3N for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:08:53 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nSd-000497-B5 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:08:51 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nSX-000475-CY for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:08:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nSX-000472-8Y for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:08:45 -0500 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0nDz-0002mx-Vg for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:53:44 -0500 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC278FE9D845 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:53:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 14 Feb 05 20:53:41 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:54:49 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20050213151851.GA4056@miracle> <200502132136.21750.okuji@enbug.org> <87is4vaqz1.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> In-Reply-To: <87is4vaqz1.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502142154.49417.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: [patch] configfile X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:08:51 -0000 On Monday 14 February 2005 20:20, Marco Gerards wrote: > What I had in mind was to change the menu in memory. But I don't > have any problems with a few lost bytes either. So we just do it > like in Hollis' patch? In that case I'll review so it can be > applied. I checked how much memory was consumed with grub-emu. I loaded a config file and executed a command to show a stack pointer on the command-line interface, then I reloaded the same config file and did the same command. The result was 0xbffff184 and 0xbffff074. The difference is 272 in decimal. So I think this is negligible. Okuji