From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nfH-0000rm-SG for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:21:55 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nf5-0000mb-Ln for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:21:43 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nez-0000iA-PX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:21:38 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1D0nez-0000f1-1F for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:21:37 -0500 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1D0nMI-0003Vn-HX for grub-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:02:18 -0500 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 246AEFE9D845 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:02:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 14 Feb 05 21:02:17 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:03:25 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <20050213151851.GA4056@miracle> <87is4vaqz1.fsf@marco.marco-g.com> <200502142154.49417.okuji@enbug.org> In-Reply-To: <200502142154.49417.okuji@enbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502142203.25888.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: [patch] configfile X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:21:47 -0000 On Monday 14 February 2005 21:54, Yoshinori K. Okuji wrote: > I checked how much memory was consumed with grub-emu. I loaded a > config file and executed a command to show a stack pointer on the > command-line interface, then I reloaded the same config file and did > the same command. The result was 0xbffff184 and 0xbffff074. The > difference is 272 in decimal. So I think this is negligible. I forgot to report a bug in the patch. When I go back to the command-line interface by pressing ESC, the display is not refreshed. I'm not sure how to fix this cleanly. Okuji