From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, kraxel@bytesex.org
Cc: ncunningham@cyclades.com, bernard@blackham.com.au,
torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in bttv
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 02:00:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050215010047.GL5415@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050214134658.324076c9.akpm@osdl.org>
Hi!
This fixes u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in bttv. Please apply,
Pavel
--- clean-mm/drivers/media/video/bttv-driver.c 2005-02-15 00:34:38.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-mm/drivers/media/video/bttv-driver.c 2005-02-15 01:04:10.000000000 +0100
@@ -3921,7 +3921,7 @@
return;
}
-static int bttv_suspend(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, u32 state)
+static int bttv_suspend(struct pci_dev *pci_dev, pm_message_t state)
{
struct bttv *btv = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev);
struct bttv_buffer_set idle;
--
People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers...
...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-15 1:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-14 5:43 PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 21:34 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 21:46 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-14 21:57 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 22:04 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 22:09 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-14 23:41 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:15 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 0:15 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:21 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 1:13 ` Bernard Blackham
2005-02-15 0:31 ` Fix pm_message_t in generic code [was Re: PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes] Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:46 ` Nigel Cunningham
2005-02-15 0:39 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in USB " Pavel Machek
2005-02-17 23:40 ` Greg KH
2005-02-28 1:24 ` Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:41 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in OSS Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:46 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in PCMCIA Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:47 ` FIx u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in firewire Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 22:12 ` Jody McIntyre
2005-02-15 0:51 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in network device drivers Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:54 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in framebuffers Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:55 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in i8042.c Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 13:10 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-02-15 0:57 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in MMC Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 0:58 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in serials Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:00 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in macintosh Pavel Machek
2005-02-15 1:00 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2005-02-15 1:01 ` Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in AGP Pavel Machek
2005-02-14 21:46 ` PATCH: Address lots of pending pm_message_t changes Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050215010047.GL5415@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bernard@blackham.com.au \
--cc=kraxel@bytesex.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ncunningham@cyclades.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.