All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	paulus@samba.org, anton@samba.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	ralf@linux-mips.org, tony.luck@intel.com, ak@suse.de,
	willy@debian.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:33:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050215193304.GA1175@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050215140149.0b06c96b.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 02:01:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This patch does:
> 	- consolidate the three implementations of compat_sys_waitid
> 	  (some were called sys32_waitid).
> 	- adds sys_waitid syscall to ppc
> 	- adds sys_waitid and compat_sys_waitid syscalls to ppc64
> 
> Parisc seemed to assume th existance of compat_sys_waitid.  The MIPS
> syscall tables have me confused and may need updating.  I have arbitrarily
> chosen the next available syscall number on ppc and ppc64, I hope this is
> correct.

I posted a (not-consolidated) sys32_waitid to the MIPS list on Sunday.
The syscall tables should confuse you :-)  N32 needs to use compat
versions of most structures, but not siginfo_t.  O32 needs to use
compat versions of everything.  Your new version can replace the
sys32_waitid from my patch, but not sysn32_waitid.

Ralf, I'll let you sort it out :-)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery, LLC

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-02-15 19:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-15  3:01 [PATCH] Consolidate compat_sys_waitid Stephen Rothwell
2005-02-15  3:01 ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-02-15  9:51 ` Andi Kleen
2005-02-15 11:06   ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-02-15 11:10     ` Andi Kleen
2005-02-15 18:37 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-15 18:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-02-15 19:23   ` Andi Kleen
2005-02-15 19:27     ` Al Viro
2005-02-18  5:22   ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-02-22 13:36     ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-02-22 13:42       ` Stephen Rothwell
2005-02-22 18:55         ` David S. Miller
2005-02-15 19:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2005-02-16  0:06 ` Paul Mackerras
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-15 18:09 Luck, Tony
2005-03-07  1:08 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050215193304.GA1175@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=dan@debian.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=willy@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.