From: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@arm.linux.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: [PATCH] kthread_bind new worker threads when onlining cpu
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 20:06:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050216020628.GA25596@otto> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050215070217.GB13568@elte.hu>
Hi Andrew-
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 08:02:17AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > It looks as if we need to explicitly bind worker threads to a newly
> > onlined cpu. This gets rid of the smp_processor_id warnings from
> > cache_reap. Adding a little more instrumentation to the debug
> > smp_processor_id showed that new worker threads were actually running
> > on the wrong cpu...
> >
> > Does this look ok?
>
> indeed - looks much better than the 'turn off the warning' solution.
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
We weren't binding new worker threads to their cpu when onlining.
Using preempt and the debug version of smp_processor_id found this.
Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <ntl@pobox.com>
Index: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk2/kernel/workqueue.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk2.orig/kernel/workqueue.c 2005-02-14 11:13:08.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk2/kernel/workqueue.c 2005-02-14 15:18:35.000000000 -0600
@@ -485,8 +485,10 @@
case CPU_ONLINE:
/* Kick off worker threads. */
- list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list)
+ list_for_each_entry(wq, &workqueues, list) {
+ kthread_bind(wq->cpu_wq[hotcpu].thread, hotcpu);
wake_up_process(wq->cpu_wq[hotcpu].thread);
+ }
break;
case CPU_UP_CANCELED:
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-16 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-11 23:28 2.6-bk: cpu hotplug + preempt = smp_processor_id warnings galore Nathan Lynch
2005-02-11 23:56 ` Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-12 0:56 ` Nathan Lynch
2005-02-12 18:59 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-14 21:59 ` Nathan Lynch
2005-02-15 7:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-16 2:06 ` Nathan Lynch [this message]
2005-02-16 5:31 ` [PATCH] Run softirqs on proper processor on offline Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-16 5:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2005-02-16 5:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-02-16 6:17 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-15 15:29 ` 2.6-bk: cpu hotplug + preempt = smp_processor_id warnings galore Zwane Mwaikambo
2005-02-15 17:26 ` Nathan Lynch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050216020628.GA25596@otto \
--to=ntl@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=zwane@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.