From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Peikov Subject: Re: No route to localhost in virtual domains Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:25:29 +0200 Message-ID: <200502231725.29633.vanio@netclime.com> References: <200502231706.38982.vanio@netclime.com> Reply-To: vanio@netclime.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: <200502231706.38982.vanio@netclime.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Hi again! Sorry for the first stupid question - while reading my email I saw that I didn't give 127.0.0.1 IP to lo interface. Still the problem with domain0's network persists. Any help would be greatly appreciated!! Thanks again! Regards, Ivan Peikov On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:06, Ivan Peikov wrote: > Hi! > I'm running Xen 2.0.4 over patched 2.6.10 kernel and have problem with > routing to loopback interface in virtual domains (can't ping 127.0.0.1). > Here is how it looks: > > -------------- > root@vm1:/tmp# ifconfig > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr AA:00:00:5F:BB:9C > inet addr:192.168.0.101 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:171856 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:160196 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:37456710 (35.7 Mb) TX bytes:51323199 (48.9 Mb) > > lo Link encap:Local Loopback > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 > RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) > > root@vm1:/tmp# route > Kernel IP routing table > Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use > Iface 192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 > 0 eth0 default rtr.bg.nc 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 > 0 eth0 -------------- > > When I attempt to add the route manually I get this: > > -------------- > root@vm1:/tmp# /sbin/route add -net 127.0.0.0 netmask 255.0.0.0 lo > SIOCADDRT: No such device > -------------- > > Routing through eth0 works fine. > Should I somehow export the loopback interface to virtual domains and how? > > While still on the topic, I'd like to ask another (probably stupid) > networking question. > I still can't get the dom0's network running. When virtual machines get > started and xen-br0 bridge gets up, the MAC address of my NIC gets > associated with the bridge and no matter what I do, I can't route no > packets to and from dom0's eth0 inteface. All the other virtual domains > have no such problem. Any idea how do I solve this? > > Thanks!! > > Regards, > Ivan Peikov > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xen-devel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click