From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261516AbVBWSS0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:18:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261518AbVBWSSZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:18:25 -0500 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:11498 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261516AbVBWSSS (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:18:18 -0500 Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:53:58 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Michal Januszewski Cc: Pavel Machek , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Bootsplash for 2.6.11-rc4 Message-ID: <20050223175358.GN13081@kroah.com> References: <20050218165254.GA1359@elf.ucw.cz> <20050219011433.GA5954@spock.one.pl> <20050219230326.GB13135@kroah.com> <20050220131505.GC19282@spock.one.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050220131505.GC19282@spock.one.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Feb 20, 2005 at 02:15:05PM +0100, Michal Januszewski wrote: > On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 03:03:26PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > Pavel, I agree with Michal, take a look at this version of the code > > instead of the version that you posted. It's a _whole_ lot more sane, > > and possibly even mergable. > > > > Michal, any thoughts on submitting it for inclusion? It seems pretty > > stable now. > > It is pretty stable indeed, I haven't had any major bug reports for > quite some time now. It's probably as ready as it's ever going to be. > So the question is: what should I do with it? Who do I send it to? As per Documentation/SubmittingPatches, you take the patch, split it up into logic parts, and post it here at lkml, with a Signed-off-by: line and a good ChangeLog description in each email. We can take it from there... thanks, greg k-h