From: Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Uwe Bonnes <bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de>,
Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl>,
akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] partitions/msdos.c
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:52:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050226225203.GA25217@apps.cwi.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0502261424430.25732@ppc970.osdl.org>
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 02:28:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Would it not make more sense to just sanity-check the size itself, and
> throw it out if the partition size (plus start) is bigger than the disk
> size?
I don't mind.
> There might well be people use use partition type 0, just because they
> just never _set_ the partition type.. I don't think Linux has ever cared
> about any type except for the "extended partition" type, so checking for
> zero doesn't seem very safe..
The default fdisk will assign type 83 to a newly created partition.
One has to change it by hand to 0. So, I do not think testing against 0
is so bad. A heuristic, You give another heuristic. Probably there will
be a point in time where we need both.
(About type 0: DOS has used type 0 as definition of unused. It is not
bad if Linux uses DOS-conventions for a DOS-type partition table.)
Andries
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-26 22:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-26 21:35 [PATCH] partitions/msdos.c Andries Brouwer
2005-02-26 22:04 ` Uwe Bonnes
2005-02-26 22:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-26 22:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-26 23:24 ` Uwe Bonnes
2005-02-26 23:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-26 23:53 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-02-26 22:52 ` Andries Brouwer [this message]
2005-02-26 23:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-26 23:40 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-02-26 23:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-27 0:47 ` Uwe Bonnes
2005-02-27 1:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-02-27 14:33 ` Uwe Bonnes
2005-02-27 1:07 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-03-01 6:53 ` Rogier Wolff
2005-03-19 21:54 ` Werner Almesberger
2005-03-19 22:28 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050226225203.GA25217@apps.cwi.nl \
--to=andries.brouwer@cwi.nl \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=bon@elektron.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.