All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: split kobject creation and hotplug event generation
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:24:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050228202443.GA25248@vrfy.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050228194642.GA21323@kroah.com>

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 11:46:42AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:53:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > This splits the implicit generation of a hotplug events from
> > kobject_add() and kobject_del(), to give the user of of these
> > functions control over the time the event is created.
> > 
> > The kobject_register() and unregister functions still have the same
> > behavior and emit the events by themselves.
> > 
> > The class, block and device core is changed now to emit the hotplug
> > event _after_ the "dev" file, the "device" symlink and the default
> > attributes are created. This will save udev from spinning in a stat() loop
> > to wait for the files to appear, which is expensive if we have a lot of
> > concurrent events.
> 
> So, does this solve the issue that everyone has been complaining about
> for years with the hotplug event happening before the sysfs files are
> present?

I expect most of them, yes. It is not a guarantee, cause drivers can and will
create attributes at any time. :) But the most interesting default ones, that
people tend to expect at event time will be there _before_ the event happens.

To get this for the whole system and not only the class+block core, a few remainig
places that use kobject_register() need to be changed to use kobject_add(), but
that is a trivial change and nice too, cause it cleans up some error pathes, where
a device needs to be unregistered in the same function and it emits two completely
useless events for that.

> And if we add this, can we pretty much get rid of all of the
> wait_for_sysfs like logic in udev?

Yes, that was the motivation to do this. With all the hotplug env vars
we have now, we can throw out all the compiled-in lists and if some crazy
devices still need to wait, we can add something to udev's rule logic, that a
configured rule will wait for that file to show up.

Thanks,
Kay

  reply	other threads:[~2005-02-28 20:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-02-26  5:53 split kobject creation and hotplug event generation Kay Sievers
2005-02-26  6:03 ` Kay Sievers
2005-02-28 19:46 ` Greg KH
2005-02-28 20:24   ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2005-03-01  7:56     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050228202443.GA25248@vrfy.org \
    --to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.