From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from fed1rmmtao07.cox.net (fed1rmmtao07.cox.net [68.230.241.32]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B4CD67A6D for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 04:12:29 +1100 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:11:46 -0700 From: Matt Porter To: Takeharu KATO Message-ID: <20050303101146.A8869@cox.net> References: <4226FF62.30007@jp.fujitsu.com> <42272B69.8000303@ybb.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <42272B69.8000303@ybb.ne.jp>; from takeharu1219@ybb.ne.jp on Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:21:13AM +0900 Cc: ppcembed Subject: Re: PowerPC4xx Watchdog List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:21:13AM +0900, Takeharu KATO wrote: > Hi Kumar, > > Thank you for your suggestion. > Kumar Gala wrote: > > One thing the code needs is a general name cleanup. Its just confusing > > to me for e500 to have 4xx references. > > > How about the use of booke instead of 4xx? Yes, please. :) > I seem to use ``booke'' for common name for them like > arch/ppc/kernel/head_booke.h in the kernel source. > > Strictly speaking, PowerPC4xx series may not be called booke. > But I think that it is more preferable than current name. 440 is strictly Book E, 405 is a hybrid that pulled borrowed from Green book and Book E. -Matt