From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicholas Lee Subject: Re: Networking problems with debian packages Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 22:19:36 +1300 Message-ID: <20050305091936.GA21010@stateless> References: <200503031213.27518.xen.christian@safersignup.com> <200503032214.44684.xen.christian@safersignup.com> <20050304211549.GA18627@stateless> <200503051012.30922.xen.christian@safersignup.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503051012.30922.xen.christian@safersignup.com> Sender: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: xen-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Christian Wicke Cc: xen-devel@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:12:30AM +0100, Christian Wicke wrote: > * If I have a local network with free ip addresses in my subnet, then I assign > those addresses to my domUs. The debian packages plus iproute work out of the > box. Yes, bridged network. > * If I don't have free ip addresses in the subnet of eth0, I use local > addresses for my domU. I can bridge the vif interfaces so that they the domUs > can talk to each other, but eth0 must not be on the bridge. I need to set up > masquerading and ip forwarding if domU wants to connect to the internet. I suggest you create a second bridge interface for routed vs bridge interfaces. Nicholas ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click