From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, chrisw@osdl.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.11.1
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 17:46:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050305174654.J3282@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0503050930430.2304@ppc970.osdl.org>; from torvalds@osdl.org on Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:40:59AM -0800
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 09:40:59AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I love BK, but what BK does well is merging and maintaining trees full of
> good stuff. What BK sucks at is experimental stuff where you don't know
> whether something should be eventually used or not.
Wait a minute - why would stuff going into 2.6.x.y be "experimental"
stuff? Wasn't stability the whole point of this tree?
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-05 17:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-04 17:53 Linux 2.6.11.1 Greg KH
2005-03-04 17:53 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:34 ` Ian Pilcher
2005-03-04 22:29 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:44 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 20:58 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 21:43 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:54 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 22:08 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-04 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 22:05 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-05 0:06 ` Greg KH
2005-03-05 0:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 7:53 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-06 5:05 ` Greg KH
2005-03-05 1:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-06 5:03 ` Greg KH
2005-03-05 9:51 ` Russell King
2005-03-05 17:19 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 17:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 17:46 ` Russell King [this message]
2005-03-05 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-03-05 21:49 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-05 22:06 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-05 23:26 ` Gene Heskett
2005-03-07 17:18 ` Alan Cox
2005-03-08 20:16 ` Lee Revell
2005-03-05 17:50 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 18:22 ` Randy.Dunlap
2005-03-05 0:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 21:15 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-03-04 21:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-04 21:51 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-04 21:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 7:11 ` James Bourne
2005-03-08 22:07 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-03-08 22:41 ` Chris Wright
2005-03-04 21:50 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-04 23:35 ` Andries Brouwer
2005-03-04 20:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-04 20:53 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 21:02 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-03-05 18:32 ` L. A. Walsh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-04 19:28 Paolo
2005-03-04 19:55 ` Greg KH
2005-03-04 20:01 ` Paolo
2005-03-04 20:00 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-05 6:16 Shawn Starr
2005-03-06 5:06 ` Greg KH
2005-03-07 4:01 ` Shawn Starr
2005-03-07 3:58 ` Randy.Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050305174654.J3282@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.