All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chip Salzenberg <chip@pobox.com>
To: axboe@suse.de, B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: NEC IDE DVD writer breaks when writing with DMA; is this normal?
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:45:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050307164553.GA21402@perlsupport.com> (raw)

I've recently added an NEC DVD writer (ND-6450A) to my ThinkPad A30.
It breaks badly if I try to write with it with cdrecord or
dvd+rw-tools when DMA is on.  With DMA off, it works, but it uses a
heck of a lot of CPU time -- the whole laptop is really really doggy.

Is this the kind of thing I should just expect from DVD writers?  Or
is this a good candidate for some driver work to adjust for the quirks
of this device?

System info follows:

[boot log]

kernel: ICH3M: chipset revision 1
kernel: ICH3M: not 100%% native mode: will probe irqs later
kernel:     ide0: BM-DMA at 0x1860-0x1867, BIOS settings: hda:DMA, hdb:pio
kernel:     ide1: BM-DMA at 0x1868-0x186f, BIOS settings: hdc:pio, hdd:pio
kernel: hda: HTS548080M9AT00, ATA DISK drive
kernel: ide0 at 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6 on irq 14
kernel: hdc: _NEC DVD+/-RW ND-6450A, ATAPI CD/DVD-ROM drive
kernel: ide1 at 0x170-0x177,0x376 on irq 15
kernel: hda: max request size: 1024KiB
kernel: hda: 156301488 sectors (80026 MB) w/7877KiB Cache, CHS=16383/255/63, UDMA(100)
kernel:  hda: hda1 hda2 < hda5 hda6 hda7 hda8 >

[error log]

Feb 18 12:13:00 kernel: sr0: scsi3-mmc drive: 24x/24x writer cd/rw xa/form2 cdda tray
Feb 18 12:13:00 kernel: Uniform CD-ROM driver Revision: 3.20
Feb 18 12:13:00 kernel: Attached scsi CD-ROM sr0 at scsi0, channel 0, id 0, lun 0
[...]
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: DMA timeout retry
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: timeout waiting for DMA
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest }
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: drive not ready for command
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: status error: error=0x04 { AbortedCommand }
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: drive not ready for command
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: status error: error=0x04 { AbortedCommand }
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: drive not ready for command
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: status error: status=0x59 { DriveReady SeekComplete DataRequest Error }
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: status error: error=0x04 { AbortedCommand }
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: ide: failed opcode was: unknown
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: hdc: drive not ready for command
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: ide-scsi: No active request in idescsi_eh_reset
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: scsi: Device offlined - not ready after error recovery: host 0 channel 0 id 0 lun 0
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: SCSI error : <0 0 0 0> return code = 0x2
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device
Feb 18 12:19:46 kernel: scsi0 (0:0): rejecting I/O to offline device

[hdparm -i]

 Model=_NEC DVD+/-RW ND-6450A, FwRev=2.36, SerialNo=
 Config={ Removeable DTR<=5Mbs DTR>10Mbs nonMagnetic }
 RawCHS=0/0/0, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
 BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=0kB, MaxMultSect=0
 (maybe): CurCHS=0/0/0, CurSects=0, LBA=yes, LBAsects=0
 IORDY=yes, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
 PIO modes:  pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 
 DMA modes:  mdma0 mdma1 *mdma2 
 AdvancedPM=no

[lspci -v]

0000:00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801CAM IDE U100 (rev 01) (prog-if 8a [Master SecP PriP])
        Subsystem: IBM ThinkPad A/T/X Series
        Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 9
        I/O ports at <ignored>
        I/O ports at <ignored>
        I/O ports at <ignored>
        I/O ports at <ignored>
        I/O ports at 1860 [size=16]
        Memory at 28000000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=1K]

-- 
Chip Salzenberg            - a.k.a. -            <chip@pobox.com>
         Open Source is not an excuse to write fun code
            then leave the actual work to others.

                 reply	other threads:[~2005-03-07 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050307164553.GA21402@perlsupport.com \
    --to=chip@pobox.com \
    --cc=B.Zolnierkiewicz@elka.pw.edu.pl \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.