Re: [PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:50:19PM +0000, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
> ChangeSet 1.1982.132.7, 2005/03/07 13:50:19-08:00, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
> 
> 	[PATCH] resync ATI PCI idents into base kernel
> 
> 
> 
>  pci_ids.h |   11 +++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 11 insertions(+)
> 
> 
> diff -Nru a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h
> --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h	2005-03-07 14:17:11 -08:00
> +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h	2005-03-07 14:17:11 -08:00
> @@ -352,10 +352,21 @@
>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS300_133	0x5831
>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS300_166	0x5832
>  #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS300_200	0x5833
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_100     0x7830
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_133     0x7831
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_166     0x7832
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS350_200     0x7833
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_100     0x5a30
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_133     0x5a31
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_166     0x5a32
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS400_200     0x5a33
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_ATI_RS480         0x5950

Was there a reason you did this without using tabs, like the rest of the
file?

Again, the maintainer chain is well documented...

{sigh}

Oh, no Signed-off-by: line either :(

greg k-h