From: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
To: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: process file descriptor limit handling
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 15:28:37 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050309232837.GI5389@shell0.pdx.osdl.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FBD1BD2.908@redhat.com>
* Ulrich Drepper (drepper@redhat.com) wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> The current kernel (and all before as far as I can see) have a problem
> with the file system limit handling. The behavior does not conform to
> the current POSIX spec.
<snip>
> It might also be that some wording is getting in the specification which
> will allow the current kernel behavior to continue to exist. More
> through a loophole, but still.
This seems the case. SuS v3 says:
setrlimit
RLIMIT_NOFILE
This is a number one greater than the maximum value that the system
may assign to a newly-created descriptor. If this limit is exceeded,
functions that allocate a file descriptor shall fail with errno set
to [EMFILE]. This limit constrains the number of file descriptors
that a process may allocate.
open
[EMFILE]
{OPEN_MAX} file descriptors are currently open in the calling process.
limits.h
{OPEN_MAX}
Maximum number of files that one process can have open at any one time.
Minimum Acceptable Value: {_POSIX_OPEN_MAX}
So, one view says your test program is within the spec, since the new fd
is still one less than the current rlimit.
Anyway, here's a simple patch that would fail the second setrlimit, as you
suggested.
thanks,
-chris
--
Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-09 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-20 19:53 process file descriptor limit handling Ulrich Drepper
2005-03-09 23:28 ` Chris Wright [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050309232837.GI5389@shell0.pdx.osdl.net \
--to=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.