All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Yoichi Yuasa <yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch][resend] convert a remaining verify_area to access_ok (was: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-mm1] mips: more convert verify_area to access_ok) (fwd)
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:56:40 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050318225640.GA4817@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503180109490.2512@dragon.hyggekrogen.localhost>

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 01:17:47AM +0100, Jesper Juhl wrote:

> I hope I did a descent job and that you didn't waste too much time 
> duplicating effort...

Didn't look too hard at it since my patch of something like 2,500 lines
should be a superset of yours.

> > The last instance of verify_area() in the MIPS code is now the definition
> > itself.
> > 
> The plan is to wait for a few months (or a few kernel releases - whichever 
> comes first) and then I'll send Andrew patches to remove it completely.
> There are still a few related nits left, like the FPU_verify_area function 
> arch/i386/math-emu/reg_ld_str.c and the rw_verify_area function in 
> fs/read_write.c that I want to get out of the way first (think I'll 
> probably end up attempting to rename those s/verify_area/access_ok/ and 
> see if people scream).

Access_ok was introduced in 2.1.4.  Easy for people to write code that's
portable and so verify_area should die a peaceful death.

  Ralf

      reply	other threads:[~2005-03-20 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-16 21:35 [patch][resend] convert a remaining verify_area to access_ok (was: Re: [PATCH 2.6.11-mm1] mips: more convert verify_area to access_ok) (fwd) Jesper Juhl
2005-03-16 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2005-03-16 23:01   ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-17 13:14   ` Ralf Baechle
2005-03-17 21:44   ` Ralf Baechle
2005-03-17 21:43 ` Ralf Baechle
2005-03-18  0:17   ` Jesper Juhl
2005-03-18 22:56     ` Ralf Baechle [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050318225640.GA4817@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=juhl-lkml@dif.dk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuasa@hh.iij4u.or.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.