From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:01:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050321000149.GD26230@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050320235946.GA4449@stusta.de>
On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:59:46AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 06:32:03PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:12:32AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 05:42:34PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 08:25:49PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > > Do we really need a global variable that does only hold the value of
> > > > > NR_CPUS?
> > > >
> > > > Yes.
> > > >
> > > > NR_CPUS = compile time
> > > > maxcpus = boot command line at runtime.
> > >
> > > If this is how is was expected to work - it isn't exactly what is
> > > currently implemented.
> >
> > It's ugly, as its setting the same thing in two different places, but
> > I don't see any obvious reason why it won't work.
> >...
>
> I might be too dumb, but where are the mpparse.c maxcpus variables ever
> set to any value different from NR_CPUS?
arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c:parse_cmdline_early()
...
else if (!memcmp(from, "maxcpus=", 8)) {
extern unsigned int maxcpus;
maxcpus = simple_strtoul(from + 8, NULL, 0);
}
...
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-21 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-20 19:25 [2.6 patch] i386/x86_64 mpparse.c: kill maxcpus Adrian Bunk
2005-03-20 22:42 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-20 23:12 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-20 23:32 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-20 23:59 ` Adrian Bunk
2005-03-21 0:01 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-03-21 0:45 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050321000149.GD26230@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=bunk@stusta.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.