From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Oester Subject: Re: ip_conntrack table full problem Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:21:47 -0800 Message-ID: <20050321162147.GA14696@linuxace.com> References: <200503141647.42299.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> <20050314171821.GA29034@linuxace.com> <200503211513.59943.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel To: Thomas Jarosch Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200503211513.59943.thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 03:13:59PM +0100, Thomas Jarosch wrote: > > > I'm facing a problem with conntrack on a 2.4.21 kernel. > > > One machine which firewalls a webradio reproducable > > > becomes unresponsive every week with > > > "ip_conntrack: table full, dropping packet." > > > > When this happens, what does output from this look like: > > > > wc -l /proc/net/ip_conntrack ; grep ip_conntrack /proc/slabinfo > > It happend again on Sunday night: > > wc -l: > 35 /proc/net/ip_conntrack > > /proc/slabinfo: > ip_conntrack 16263 16272 320 1356 1356 1 Yes, you're leaking conntracks somewhere. Any possibility of testing a somewhat newer kernel than 2.4.21? This may have already been fixed. Phil