From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261677AbVCVTXF (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:23:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261685AbVCVTXE (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:23:04 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-174.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.174]:30424 "EHLO cheetah.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261677AbVCVTW6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:22:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:21:25 -0800 From: "David S. Miller" To: "David S. Miller" Cc: hugh@veritas.com, akpm@osdl.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, tony.luck@intel.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] freepgt: free_pgtables use vma list Message-Id: <20050322112125.0330c4ee.davem@davemloft.net> In-Reply-To: <20050322110144.3a3002d9.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20050322034053.311b10e6.akpm@osdl.org> <20050322110144.3a3002d9.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.1 (GTK+ 1.2.10; sparc-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: "_;p5u5aPsO,_Vsx"^v-pEq09'CU4&Dc1$fQExov$62l60cgCc%FnIwD=.UF^a>?5'9Kn[;433QFVV9M..2eN.@4ZWPGbdi<=?[:T>y?SD(R*-3It"Vj:)"dP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:01:44 -0800 "David S. Miller" wrote: > Hmmm... Thinking some more, one thing that is unique in the PPC64 and SPARC64 cases is that we are executing primarily 32-bit tasks and in such cases one PGD maps the entire address space. I wonder if the free_pgtables() loops simply aren't coping well with something like that. I'm trying to analyze my traces some more.