From: Max Kellermann <max@duempel.org>
To: Nguyen Dinh Nam <64vn@cardvn.net>
Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org
Subject: Re: is this make sense: iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -j SNAT --to 0.0.0.0
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:55:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050322145522.GA12927@roonstrasse.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42403008.9070006@cardvn.net>
On 2005/03/22 15:47, Nguyen Dinh Nam <64vn@cardvn.net> wrote:
> But I think that this approach is more interesting
> iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -j SNAT --to 0.0.0.0
>
> The rule clears the source IP address from the packet, later, routing
> code will bind an ip address to the packet based on routing decision. In
> the case where the host has several internet providers, the traditional
> method needs several rules, as well as using CONNMARK to bind each TCP
> connection to only one internet provider. If this new approach is
> possible, it'll simplify the problem tremendously
Why don't you just use -j MASQUERADE if writing one rule per interface
is too much work for you?
I don't understand how CONNMARK helps with your "traditional method".
Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-22 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-22 14:47 is this make sense: iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -j SNAT --to 0.0.0.0 Nguyen Dinh Nam
2005-03-22 14:55 ` Max Kellermann [this message]
2005-03-22 18:56 ` Nguyen Dinh Nam
2005-03-25 17:28 ` Nguyen Dinh Nam
2005-03-25 19:07 ` Newbie question about fragmentation and the PRE_ROUTING hook Devesh Agrawal
2005-03-25 23:32 ` Devesh Agrawal
2005-03-26 12:03 ` is this make sense: iptables -A PREROUTING -t nat -j SNAT --to 0.0.0.0 Jonas Berlin
2005-03-26 15:02 ` Nguyen Dinh Nam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050322145522.GA12927@roonstrasse.net \
--to=max@duempel.org \
--cc=64vn@cardvn.net \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.