From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.43) id 1DDq75-0003hT-AM for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:36:31 -0500 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDq74-0003hO-8m for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:36:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DDq73-0003h4-F1 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:36:29 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DDq73-0003h1-C2 for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:36:29 -0500 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DDpro-0005FN-MW for grub-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:20:44 -0500 Received: from ASSP-nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAF0FF16CC0 for ; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:20:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from 127.0.0.1 ([127.0.0.1] helo=localhost) by ASSP-nospam ; 22 Mar 05 20:20:43 -0000 From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:20:43 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1 References: <1111431300.423f1884b4a97@imp4-q.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <1111431300.423f1884b4a97@imp4-q.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503222120.43235.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: Grub2 on Mac OS X X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:36:30 -0000 On Monday 21 March 2005 07:55 pm, Antoine Terrienne wrote: > Here is a patch with the modifications I made. Please tell me if some of > them are wrong. I hope I would help. Could you make a patch with -u? The standard diff format is too difficult for me. I describe what I think are not appropriate in your patch: - memalign should not be just a macro. memalign is not the same as malloc. - The macro _MACOSX_ should not be defined. OS-specific code should be enabled in a more generic way. Take a look at the autoconf manual and the autobook . - Rather than replacing argp with getopt, please include the standalone version of argp . - ChangeLog, please. Okuji