From: cliff white <cliffw@osdl.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: gcc confused about static inline. - route.c
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:59:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050328145908.6f2cd38a@es175> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050328214103.GA3609@redhat.com>
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:41:03 -0500
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 01:23:14PM -0800, cliff white wrote:
> >
> > Building the gkernel bits, have this error:
> >
> > net/ipv4/route.c: In function `rt_remove_balanced_route':
> > net/ipv4/route.c:151: sorry, unimplemented: inlining failed in call to 'compare_keys': function body not available
> > net/ipv4/route.c:540: sorry, unimplemented: called from here
> >
> > route.c has this define at line 151
> > :
> > static inline int compare_keys(struct flowi *fl1, struct flowi *fl2);
> >
> > function body is defined starting at line 861.
> >
> > We are using gcc 3.4.2 right now, is there a way to fix this?
> > thanks
> > cliffw
>
>
> Shuffling the order of the functions fixed this for me.
>
Thanks, that looked like the answer, but i wanted to ask anyway...
cliffw
> Dave
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
>
> diff -urNp --exclude-from=/home/davej/.exclude linux-10001/init/Makefile linux-10002/init/Makefile
> --- linux-2.6.11/net/ipv4/route.c~ 2005-03-24 19:18:24.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.11/net/ipv4/route.c 2005-03-24 19:19:39.000000000 -0500
> @@ -520,6 +520,13 @@ static inline u32 rt_score(struct rtable
> return score;
> }
>
> +static inline int compare_keys(struct flowi *fl1, struct flowi *fl2)
> +{
> + return memcmp(&fl1->nl_u.ip4_u, &fl2->nl_u.ip4_u, sizeof(fl1->nl_u.ip4_u)) == 0 &&
> + fl1->oif == fl2->oif &&
> + fl1->iif == fl2->iif;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_IP_ROUTE_MULTIPATH_CACHED
> static struct rtable **rt_remove_balanced_route(struct rtable **chain_head,
> struct rtable *expentry,
> @@ -858,13 +865,6 @@ work_done:
> out: return 0;
> }
>
> -static inline int compare_keys(struct flowi *fl1, struct flowi *fl2)
> -{
> - return memcmp(&fl1->nl_u.ip4_u, &fl2->nl_u.ip4_u, sizeof(fl1->nl_u.ip4_u)) == 0 &&
> - fl1->oif == fl2->oif &&
> - fl1->iif == fl2->iif;
> -}
> -
> static int rt_intern_hash(unsigned hash, struct rtable *rt, struct rtable **rp)
> {
> struct rtable *rth, **rthp;
>
--
"Ive always gone through periods where I bolt upright at four in the morning;
now at least theres a reason." -Michael Feldman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-28 22:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-28 21:23 gcc confused about static inline. - route.c cliff white
2005-03-28 21:41 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-28 22:59 ` cliff white [this message]
2005-03-28 21:53 ` Francois Romieu
2005-03-28 23:00 ` cliff white
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050328145908.6f2cd38a@es175 \
--to=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.