From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] optimization: defer bio_vec deallocation
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:59:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050329025932.GC435@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503290238.j2T2cQg25626@unix-os.sc.intel.com>
On Mon, Mar 28, 2005 at 06:38:23PM -0800, Chen, Kenneth W wrote:
> We have measured that the following patch give measurable performance gain
> for industry standard db benchmark. Comments?
If you can't publish results from that certain benchmark due its stupid
restrictions, could you also try running an alternative benchmark that
you can show results from ?
These nebulous claims of 'measurable gains' could mean anything.
I'm assuming you see a substantial increase in throughput, but
how much is it worth in exchange for complicating the code?
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-29 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-29 2:38 [patch] optimization: defer bio_vec deallocation Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-29 2:59 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2005-03-29 3:07 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-29 8:13 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-29 18:44 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-03-29 18:48 ` Dave Jones
2005-03-30 10:30 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-29 9:15 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050329025932.GC435@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.