From: Lars Marowsky-Bree <lmb@suse.de>
To: "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@lab.it.uc3m.es>, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RAID1 and data safety?
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:13:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050329121357.GK9998@marowsky-bree.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8kqnh2-o1n.ln1@news.it.uc3m.es>
On 2005-03-29T13:26:32, "Peter T. Breuer" <ptb@lab.it.uc3m.es> wrote:
> > Not good advice. DO put the journal on a raid device. It is much
> > safer there.
> Two journals means two possible sources of unequal information - plus the
> two datasets. We have been through this before. You get the journal
> you deserve.
The RAID never exposes this potential inconsistency to the higher levels
though.
Indeed, you get what you deserve.
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-29 12:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-29 8:54 AW: AW: RAID1 and data safety? Schuett Thomas EXT
2005-03-29 9:27 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-03-29 10:09 ` Neil Brown
2005-03-29 11:26 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-03-29 12:13 ` Lars Marowsky-Bree [this message]
2005-04-04 22:57 ` Doug Ledford
2005-03-29 9:30 ` AW: " Molle Bestefich
2005-03-29 10:08 ` AW: " Neil Brown
2005-03-29 11:29 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-03-29 16:46 ` Luca Berra
2005-03-29 18:43 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-03-29 20:07 ` Mario Holbe
2005-04-04 20:06 ` Doug Ledford
2005-04-08 12:16 ` Peter T. Breuer
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-07 15:35 AW: " Schuett Thomas EXT
2005-04-07 16:05 ` Doug Ledford
2005-04-10 17:54 ` Peter T. Breuer
2005-03-16 9:13 Molle Bestefich
2005-03-21 22:26 ` Neil Brown
2005-03-22 8:48 ` Molle Bestefich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050329121357.GK9998@marowsky-bree.de \
--to=lmb@suse.de \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ptb@lab.it.uc3m.es \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.