From: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>, baruch@ev-en.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] TCP congestion schedulers
Date: 29 Mar 2005 17:25:38 +0200
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:25:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050329152538.GF63268@muc.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050328155117.7c5de370@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
> Running on 2 Cpu Opteron using netperf loopback mode shows that the change is
> very small when averaged over 10 runs. Overall there is
> a .28% decrease in CPU usage and a .96% loss in throughput. But both those
> values are less than twice standard deviation which was .4% for the CPU measurements
> and .8% for the performance measurements. I can't see it as a worth
> bothering unless there is some big money benchmark on the line, in which case
> it would make more sense to look at other optimizations of the loopback
> path.
Opteron has no problems with indirect calls, IA64 seems to be different
though.
But when you see noticeable differences even on a Opteron I find
it somewhat worrying.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-29 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-23 21:30 [PATCH] select congestion control with one sysctl Baruch Even
2005-02-23 21:57 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-24 0:23 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-02-24 0:33 ` David S. Miller
2005-02-26 9:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
[not found] ` <421D30FA.1060900@ev-en.org>
[not found] ` <20050225120814.5fa77b13@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <20050309210442.3e9786a6.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <4230288F.1030202@ev-en.org>
[not found] ` <20050310182629.1eab09ec.davem@davemloft.net>
[not found] ` <20050311120054.4bbf675a@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
[not found] ` <20050311201011.360c00da.davem@davemloft.net>
2005-03-14 23:17 ` [RFC] TCP congestion schedulers Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-15 19:54 ` John Heffner
2005-03-15 22:16 ` John Heffner
2005-03-18 4:12 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-18 12:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-03-18 13:43 ` jamal
2005-03-18 16:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-03-18 16:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-18 16:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-03-19 20:19 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-21 21:25 ` John Heffner
2005-03-21 21:51 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-21 22:30 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-22 0:10 ` Rick Jones
2005-03-22 1:41 ` Olaf Kirch
2005-03-22 7:41 ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-28 23:51 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-29 15:25 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2005-03-29 17:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-29 18:58 ` Rick Jones
2005-03-30 9:41 ` Matt Mackall
2005-03-29 19:32 ` John Heffner
2005-03-29 20:03 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-29 20:09 ` Rick Jones
2005-04-08 19:33 ` John Heffner
2005-04-08 20:20 ` Rick Jones
2005-02-24 1:05 ` [PATCH] select congestion control with one sysctl Daniele Lacamera
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050329152538.GF63268@muc.de \
--to=ak@muc.de \
--cc=baruch@ev-en.org \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.