From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261542AbVC3ImO (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:42:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261789AbVC3ImO (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:42:14 -0500 Received: from waste.org ([216.27.176.166]:51155 "EHLO waste.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261542AbVC3ImL (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2005 03:42:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 00:42:09 -0800 From: Matt Mackall To: Christensen Tom Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Network Performance Ingo's RT-Preempt Message-ID: <20050330084209.GF25554@waste.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 27, 2005 at 10:27:40PM +0000, Christensen Tom wrote: > I'm running 2.6.11 with Ingo's Preempt patch > (realtime-preempt-2.6.11-final-V0.7.40-04). The system is SMP with a > broadcom NIC (tg3 driver). I am seeing truly appalling network performance > (2-4kbps on a 1gbps network). Is this a known issue? I know this patch is > not production ready, what traces/logs do you need/want to be able to > debug/fix this? What is your test app and what protocol does it use? What performance do you get with mainline? A tcpdump log is probably a good place to start. You might consider cc:ing Ingo and possibly netdev. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.