From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261331AbVCaLNL (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:13:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261340AbVCaLNL (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:13:11 -0500 Received: from ns1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:27042 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261331AbVCaLMg (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Mar 2005 06:12:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:12:35 +0200 From: Andi Kleen To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andi Kleen , blaisorblade@yahoo.it, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] x86_64: remove duplicated sys_time64 Message-ID: <20050331111235.GL1623@wotan.suse.de> References: <20050330173216.426CFEFECF@zion> <20050331103834.GC1623@wotan.suse.de> <20050331211059.0ddc078c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050331211059.0ddc078c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:10:59PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:38:34 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > Nack. The generic sys_time still writes to int, not long. > > That is why x86-64 has a private one. Please keep that. > > It writes to a time_t which is a __kernel_time_t which is a long on > x86-64, isn't it? At least in 2.6.10 it writes to int. -Andi