From: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
To: Philip R Auld <pauld@egenera.com>
Cc: Ian Pratt <m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk>,
Xen development list <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Kurt Garloff <garloff@suse.de>, Vincent Hanquez <tab@snarc.org>,
Christian Limpach <Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: poor domU VBD performance.
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:21:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050331192139.GW9204@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050331184309.GC13875@vienna.egenera.com>
On Thu, Mar 31 2005, Philip R Auld wrote:
> Rumor has it that on Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 08:01:52PM +0200 Jens Axboe said:
> > On Thu, Mar 31 2005, Philip R Auld wrote:
> > >
> > > My experience showed very little if any multipage
> > > IO coming out of the front end.
> >
> > There aren't that many users of multipage ios yet. direct io will use
> > it, ext2 will as well. iirc, -mm has patches for ext3 too. so it's
> > definitely improving :-)
>
> Sorry, I was being sloppy with terminology :)
>
> What I was getting at was that the backend will split requests
> up and issue each physical segment as a separate bio (at least in
> the 2.0.5 tree I have in front of me). And that none of these
> physical segments was more that 1 page.
>
> So the request merging in the back end OS is important, no?
I suppose it always is, since the merge criteria may have changed from
when the io was initially queued. If requests are always split into
single pages, then it becomes very important to merge at the backend.
--
Jens Axboe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-31 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-30 11:16 RE: RE: poor domU VBD performance Ian Pratt
2005-03-30 17:01 ` peter bier
2005-03-30 18:05 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-31 7:05 ` RE: " Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 7:10 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 8:17 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-31 8:19 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 14:33 ` Philip R Auld
2005-03-31 15:34 ` Kurt Garloff
2005-03-31 15:39 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 15:41 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 16:27 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-03-31 17:43 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 18:27 ` Kurt Garloff
2005-03-31 21:59 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-03-31 15:49 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-31 16:02 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-31 17:44 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 16:55 ` Philip R Auld
2005-03-31 16:53 ` Philip R Auld
2005-03-31 18:01 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 18:43 ` Philip R Auld
2005-03-31 19:07 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-31 19:10 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-31 19:20 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 19:21 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-04 19:36 Ian Pratt
2005-04-04 22:35 ` Nicholas Lee
2005-04-12 10:29 ` peter bier
2005-04-02 10:56 Ian Pratt
2005-04-02 12:10 ` Cédric Schieli
2005-04-01 23:22 Ian Pratt
2005-04-02 10:36 ` Cédric Schieli
2005-04-02 19:54 ` peter bier
2005-03-31 22:36 Ian Pratt
2005-03-31 23:05 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-04-01 21:40 ` Cédric Schieli
2005-03-31 21:32 Ian Pratt
2005-03-31 22:13 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-31 17:55 Ian Pratt
2005-03-31 18:04 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 18:57 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-31 19:22 ` Jens Axboe
2005-03-31 20:49 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-31 21:15 ` Keir Fraser
2005-03-31 21:27 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-04-01 5:43 ` Jens Axboe
2005-04-01 16:36 ` peter bier
[not found] <A95E2296287EAD4EB592B5DEEFCE0E9D1E3905@liverpoolst.ad.cl.cam.ac.uk>
2005-03-29 22:45 ` RE: " Kurt Garloff
2005-03-29 22:59 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-29 23:19 ` Kurt Garloff
2005-03-29 23:26 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-29 14:19 Ian Pratt
2005-03-29 15:27 ` peter bier
2005-03-28 22:17 Ian Pratt
2005-03-29 8:44 ` peter bier
2005-03-28 20:14 Ian Pratt
2005-03-28 20:18 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-28 21:48 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-28 23:38 ` Peter Bier
2005-03-29 0:27 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-29 11:39 ` peter bier
2005-03-28 18:55 Ian Pratt
2005-03-28 19:33 ` Andrew Theurer
2005-03-27 17:41 Ian Pratt
2005-03-28 8:48 ` peter bier
2005-03-28 12:44 ` peter bier
2005-03-29 6:20 ` Pasi Kärkkäinen
2005-03-26 18:14 Peter Bier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050331192139.GW9204@suse.de \
--to=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=Christian.Limpach@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=garloff@suse.de \
--cc=m+Ian.Pratt@cl.cam.ac.uk \
--cc=pauld@egenera.com \
--cc=tab@snarc.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.