From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Langer Subject: Re: [RFC] re-queuing usx2y-fw Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:16:11 +0200 Message-ID: <20050401111611.GC7037@tuba> References: <20050328155151.GA3552@tuba> <20050329165816.GA2696@tuba> <20050331115848.GA13462@tuba> <20050401103348.GB7037@tuba> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by alsa.alsa-project.org (ALSA's E-mail Delivery System) with SMTP id 2693C239 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:15:33 +0200 (MEST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: alsa-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Thierry Vignaud , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org List-Id: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 12:52:56PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote: > At Fri, 1 Apr 2005 12:33:48 +0200, > Martin Langer wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 06:03:41PM +0200, Thierry Vignaud wrote: > > > Martin Langer writes: > > > > > > > http://wiki.erazor-zone.de/doku.php?id=wiki:projects:linux:as31 > > > > > > why not auto enabling it if we detect the non free as31 rather than > > > just providing such flag? > > > > Is it really necessary to build it by default? I see a lot of trouble at > > the horizon due to version mismatches of as31. An as31 version check > > could solve it, though. > > Agreed. The resultant firmware should be 100% identical even if you > build by yourself. Hence I don't think it's needed so much. Controlling a checksum could solve that. md5sum? That would result in a table of as31 version and their related checksum. If someone wants to write it, go ahead :) martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Demarc: A global provider of Threat Management Solutions. Download our HomeAdmin security software for free today! http://www.demarc.com/Info/Sentarus/hamr30