From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261400AbVDBVwo (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:52:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261391AbVDBVtF (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:49:05 -0500 Received: from fire.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:57259 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261290AbVDBVl3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Apr 2005 16:41:29 -0500 Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 13:41:10 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Pavel Machek Cc: akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in drivers/mmc,mtd,scsi Message-Id: <20050402134110.24ece2e2.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20050402212954.GA2152@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20050402212954.GA2152@elf.ucw.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.7 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > > This is last of the series. I tried to submit patches through their > mainainers (when they were easy to determine, our MAINTAINERS file > sucks). You mean that there are patches in addition to these seven? > Unfortunately that probably means some patches will fail to > propagate and I'll have to fix up after -rc2 or something. Hopefully > diff will be fairly small by that time. This sort of thing is a pain all round whichever way we do it. Right now the various subsystem trees are about as small as they ever get, so the time is good to push all this in. You should go through the whole -mm, check to see whether there is work pending in bk-*.patch which also needs conversion.